What was funded: AGMARDT’s transitional Agribusiness Innovation Grant round

Nine projects were funded via AGMARDT’s transitional Agribusiness Innovation Grant (AIG) round in August 2026. This small round provided a bridge between our previous grants approach and the more relational, collaborative funding model we’re moving towards in 2027.

We received an incredible number of Expressions of Interest (EOI). Fifteen were invited to a full application. Nine projects were then funded, distributing around half a million dollars, with some funding held in reserve for more strategic, collaborative approaches to persistent problems that were targeted by multiple EOIs.

Several of the projects funded are aimed at developing or extending entire sectors (unlocking more value from wool and honey, a fund for growing organic supply, long-storing feijoas). Others put information directly into farmers’ hands (an AI scanner for orchard yield forecasting, real-time cost information for water-quality mitigation, and a diagnostic score for smarter drenching decisions).

“The nine projects we’ve funded cover large parts of the agricultural sector – horticulture, wool and sheep genetics, cattle, environmental resilience and organics – reflecting the breadth of ideas we received, and confirming that AGMARDT is well-placed to support the kind of cross-sector collaborations that can enable real transformation in future,” says Lee-Ann Marsh, Chief Executive of AGMARDT.

 

Funded projects

AI Ultrasound for Intramuscular Fat in New Zealand Sheep

neXtgen Agri International Limited was funded $109,608 (of $182,680) for an AI-enabled ultrasound and computer vision system that measures intramuscular fat in live sheep, supporting higher-value meat exports. Right now, only two accredited technicians in New Zealand can score IMF from ultrasound images, and both are already working at capacity, limiting how fast breeders can improve meat quality. neXtScan’s AI model aims to break through that ceiling, making measurement faster and more available. Breeder partners are contributing $36,800 in cash towards the project, and links with Beef + Lamb Genetics gave Trustees confidence there’s wider industry appetite for the tool.

Fund to Grow New Zealand’s Certified Organic Supply Pipeline

Organics Aotearoa New Zealand Society was awarded $60,000 (of $100,000) to design and test an innovative industry-led funding approach that helps farmers transition to certified organic production, closing a persistent barrier to higher-value organic exports. The model draws on the US’s Mad Capital Perennial Fund, which raised an oversubscribed US$78 million in 2025.

Catchment-Managed Risk-Sharing Feasibility Pilot

Perrin Ag was awarded $30,000 to test a catchment-managed risk-sharing model, where downstream landowners help fund upstream mitigation work that reduces flood and erosion risk for the whole catchment. It’s an early feasibility study, testing a new way for catchment groups to share the cost of resilience. A report will be released so the idea can be used and developed further in collaboration with industry, government and the private sector.

Evidence-Based Diagnostics for Cattle Drenching

DAGI Limited received $29,888 for TrueWorm Score, a diagnostic tool to give cattle farmers evidence-based drenching decisions, reducing unnecessary drenching and slowing the development of drench resistance. The tool will combine worm egg counts with species data. The project’s open-source approach and alignment with the wider Coalition Against Drench Resistance initiative gave Trustees confidence this would make a contribution towards slowing drench resistance in cattle, before it becomes the chronic systemic problem facing the sheep sector.

Identifying Genetic Links to a Long-Storing Feijoa Trait

Massey University was funded $115,000 (of a total $420,000) to identify genetic markers linked to extended feijoa storage life. Longer-storing cultivars could shift feijoa exports from air freight to sea freight, opening new international markets. The project, which will be delivered in partnership with the Bioeconomy Science Institute, builds on decades of breeding work by Nigel Ritson, an independent breeder whose germplasm underpins the opportunity. Trustees saw this as a rare, time-limited chance to help build an entirely new New Zealand export category from the ground up.

Vehicle Agnostic 3D Crop Scanner

HoloCrop Limited was funded $54,000 (of a $95,000 project) to develop a vehicle-agnostic 3D crop scanning system, with a camera that can be mounted on common farm vehicles to improve yield forecasting, harvest planning and supply-chain efficiency for fruit growers. Existing scanning tools have been built for ideal research scenarios with a focus on a single crop, while HoloCrop’s system will be trialled across apples, cherries and wine grapes, in partnership with growers including Rockit, Electric Cherries and Cloudy Bay. Trustees saw a clear case for the technology and wide potential benefit.

Understanding the Cost Effectiveness of Mitigation Options in Real Time

Scarlatti Limited received $30,000 to build a decision-support tool that will enable farmers to assess the current cost and effectiveness of different environmental mitigation options. Rather than creating something new for farmers to learn, the tool is designed to feed directly into platforms farmers and advisers already use, such as DairyNZ’s FarmAPT and Ballance’s MitAgator. Involvement from Dr Katrina Macintosh (DairyNZ) and Professor Richard McDowell, who respectively helped build FarmAPT and MitAgator, gave Trustees confidence the tool has a genuine path to uptake.

Wool Bioproducts Playbook

New Zealand Wool Collective received $29,900 to develop an industry playbook identifying and prioritising New Zealand’s highest-potential wool bioproduct opportunities, including keratin and cholesterol-derived products. Rather than developing a product, the playbook is designed to strategically guide where future investment, research and commercialisation effort should be targeted across the wool sector. A similar strategic research plan was previously effective for growing our merino sector. The project is being delivered in collaboration with the NZ Product Accelerator and complements AGMARDT’s investment in the Future of Fibre Aotearoa project, which aims to connect the full value chain of New Zealand’s fibre, textiles and biomaterials.

Polyphenolic Profiling of New Zealand Honey and Fruit Bioactives

Mānuka Performance Limited was awarded $30,000 (of $50,000) to test the polyphenolic profile, stability and compatibility of honey and whole-fruit bioactive formulations, to create evidenced products for high-value export markets. The project’s findings, including its testing methodology, will be shared as a case study for other New Zealand exporters working with similar ingredients.

What We Heard: AGMARDT’s Transitional Agribusiness Innovation Grant Round

We received an incredible number of Expressions of Interest (EOI) for our 2026 transitional Agribusiness Innovation Grant (AIG) round – much higher than anticipated, exceeding the number of applications we received in total across three separate grant rounds in 2024–25.

The purpose of the EOI stage of AGMARDT’s transitional AIG round was to create a short first step in the funding process to test strategic fit, before applicants were asked to commit more time to a full application.

We also found it had a second and extremely valuable purpose: as a listening exercise, letting us know where the attention, ambition and energy of our food and fibre innovators are currently focussed.

“Hearing from innovators across the full food and fibre sector gave us a much clearer picture of where the opportunities and pressure points are, and insights that are shaping where we focus next,” says Lee-Ann Marsh, Chief Executive of AGMARDT.

 

A short first step

AGMARDT continues to evolve how we can best use our resources to ignite transformation in Aotearoa New Zealand’s food and fibre sector. This transitional round was a step in that evolution, providing a bridge between the funding model AGMARDT has run for years and a redesigned, more relational and collaborative approach we’ll operate from 2027.

Rather than jumping straight to a full application, applicants were asked for a short EOI first to test alignment with AGMARDT’s strategic direction. We aimed for this to take just an hour or two for applicants and kept the process lean on AGMARDT’s side by ruling out pre-submission conversations and detailed feedback.

Projects that had already received AGMARDT funding weren’t eligible to apply again, although past recipients with new ideas were welcomed back.

“Hearing from innovators across the full food and fibre sector gave us a much clearer picture of where the opportunities and pressure points are, and insights that are shaping where we focus next”
—Lee-Ann Marsh, Chief Executive of AGMARDT.

 

What we heard

Because of the volume of EOIs received, we were able to review them across six broad themes.

Pests, crop disease and biosecurity drew a number of eligible ideas, most of them leaning toward proactive management over reactive treatment, an approach our Trustees have historically often preferred. Many took aim at a single pest, species or crop. The ideas that stood out went after several targets or crops at once. One pest in particular, varroa, was the focus of several applications. Assessing this theme raised questions about sector priorities that were difficult for AGMARDT to answer in isolation. As a result, we plan to engage with industry to better understand pest and disease priorities, and whether and how AGMARDT support might contribute to progress.

Assessing this theme raised questions about sector priorities that were difficult for AGMARDT to answer in isolation.

Ideas around livestock productivity and animal health tended to support progress that was more incremental than transformational, easing a labour or seasonal pain point rather than solving it outright. Mastitis was another focus, as it has been in many historical grant rounds. Sometimes, collaborators we’d expect to back these ideas, whether as funding partners or in-kind supporters, weren’t named in the application. When an idea for tackling a well-known problem is seeking AGMARDT investment, we look for industry to co-invest to show support.

The second-largest theme, reducing chemicals, better fertiliser and climate resilience, gave us a mix of early-stage science ideas and practical tools, with water resilience ideas emerging as a response to our changing climate. Apps, drones and AI systems built to fine-tune systems suggest that precision agrichemical application is a future state many see as important. We received more of these agritech applications compared to past grant rounds, signalling strong demand and a sector-wide funding gap linked to the shifting funding landscape. We prioritised EOIs that had clear pathways to potential commercialisation or adoption.

We received more of these agritech applications compared to past grant rounds, signalling strong demand and a sector-wide funding gap linked to the shifting funding landscape.

High-value products, ingredients and waste valorisation was the single largest group, making it a competitive field. AGMARDT had to stay disciplined and prioritised EOIs with benefit to the wider primary sector, beyond the company making the application. The strongest proposals drew on strengths specific to New Zealand and pointed to export market interest.

Many of the ideas that fell under resilient food systems and diverse crops were rooted in a single crop or region, so EOIs with more expansive potential stood out. This theme raised a question that regional or sector-wide conversations may be better placed to answer: What should regional clusters or New Zealand more broadly be producing at scale in 10 to 20 years that it isn’t today? Some of the community and conservation ideas in this theme (and others) were considered a better match for specific funding from community or philanthropic trusts than from AGMARDT.

Processing, packaging and supply chain ideas showed us some infrastructure gaps. Several EOIs focused on smarter forestry intelligence; others on localised meat processing. There were several ideas that used apps, drones and AI systems to improve yield prediction.

The clearest signal from the EOIs is that many bright ideas are being developed in isolation to tackle single facets of entrenched or systemic problems. This is an issue we’ve observed over past grant rounds, and it became even clearer to us that a more strategic, collaborative approach is needed.

 

How decisions were made

From the ideas received, AGMARDT’s Trustees approved those that best fit with our strategy to be invited, in July, to develop full proposals over three weeks. Applicants then had the option of a draft review from AGMARDT staff before submitting, and most took this up.

Full applications were then assessed for eligibility and completeness, alignment with AGMARDT’s strategic priorities, and fit with the rules that govern what AGMARDT can fund.

Final decisions made by AGMARDT’s Trustees considered where AGMARDT’s support could add unique value or make a critical difference. Trustees looked at the idea itself, the strength of the team and collaborators, and aimed for a mix across themes and innovation readiness (from early science to applied).

As always, the most important consideration was the potential impact on the sector and New Zealand.

As always, the most important consideration was the potential impact on the sector and New Zealand. Where the benefits were narrow, we considered whether an existing company or industry body could reasonably be expected to fund the work on its own. We recognise there are always more R&D ideas than there is funding, and that gap has been growing. However, AGMARDT’s pool of funding is small, and our resources can have the most impact when applied to understanding and overcoming barriers, that benefit the wider primary sector.

AGMARDT distributed around half a million dollars across this round’s approved projects, holding some of the round’s funding in reserve for persistent problems that drew multiple, overlapping EOIs. Rather than picking a single winner from among these small individual projects, we’re exploring the potential for more strategic, collaborative approach that reflects our growing focus on building trust and alignment across the sector. Early conversations about this approach have been encouraging.

 

What’s next

AGMARDT is continuing to progress towards a more relational and targeted funding strategy. We will keep engaging with a range of people across the primary industries as we develop our future approach. Stay connected through the website, newsletter and LinkedIn.

To everyone who submitted an idea: thank you.

There is a lot of innovation occuring from people who want to be involved in shaping the future of New Zealand’s food and fibre sector, and all of these ideas are invaluable as we make decisions on where we direct our resources next year.

If your idea didn’t make it through this time, we are working to make clearer what AGMARDT funds, and why, so it’s easier to see where your own work might align in future and how you can get involved.

AGMARDT opens expressions of interest for transitional grant round

AGMARDT 2026 grant round now open

AGMARDT is accepting expressions of interest (EOIs) for a transitional Agribusiness Innovation Grant (AIG) round, providing early-stage innovation funding for bold food and fibre ideas.

EOIs are open from 2 June to 29 June 2026. This is a single transitional round, run in response to demand while AGMARDT continues to develop its longer-term grants delivery strategy.

Lee-Ann Marsh, general manager, says “This transitional round is about keeping the pipeline of ideas alive while we develop the next chapter for AGMARDT’s open responsive grants. We’re looking for clear thinking on new opportunities or stubborn challenges – ideas where a novel approach could shift the dial for New Zealand agriculture. And we’re keen to explore what AGMARDT can contribute beyond the dollar. Every application this round helps us understand what the sector needs from us next.”

A new first step

AGMARDT is trialling an EOI process for this round. This short first step lets applicants quickly share their idea before committing to a full application. Applicants should expect to spend one to two hours completing an EOI.

EOIs that demonstrate the strongest strategic alignment will be invited to submit a full application in July 2026. Final funding decisions will be made by AGMARDT’s Trustees in September.

What AGMARDT is looking for

AGMARDT is particularly interested in projects that have clear progression pathways and a collaborative focus. The strongest applications will show innovative ideas with a credible market opportunity, and will tackle urgent problems or have transformative potential. This includes projects that:

  • have a clear pathway to scale or attract further investment
  • involve multiple partners bringing complementary expertise
  • show a credible market opportunity or identified demand
  • respond to an urgent sector challenge
  • have transformative potential and could create a material shift — such as a new product category — rather than an incremental improvement

For this round, AGMARDT will not be funding projects that received previous AGMARDT funding.

Keeping it simple

To keep this round efficient for everyone, AGMARDT will not be open for pre-application conversations about EOI ideas, and will not provide detailed feedback on EOIs or full applications. This approach allows the team to continue its work setting up processes and systems for future grant rounds, including how capability building will be delivered, as this is fundamental to our strategy.

This transitional round is one step in fundamentally changing the way AGMARDT operates its grant rounds, to make them easier and more targeted.

Key dates

  • EOIs open: 2 June 2026
  • EOIs close: 29 June 2026
  • Invitations to apply: July 2026
  • Full applications due: four weeks from invitation
  • Funding decisions: September 2026

EOIs should be submitted by email to [email protected], using the AGMARDT Expression of Interest template and with reference to the AIG Guidelines.

What we’re looking for

AGMARDT is in the business of supporting bold new ideas and leaders that will help accelerate a better future for food and fibres in New Zealand.

We do this through a range of grants and scholarships

So, what exactly are our trustees looking for when they consider applications?

Well, in short, high quality, high impact ideas!

It’s important that applicants demonstrate ‘impact potential’ that aligns to one or more of our priorities:

  • Regional resilience / growth
  • Regional or placed based leadership
  • Improved environmental performance
  • Growing economic value for New Zealand (at farm, community, regional or national level)
  • Collaboration / partnership

And we’re looking for evidence of need or demand, whether that’s about the problem that needs to be solved, the market opportunity or the capability / leadership needs that funding could support.

We’re also after an innovative approach – transformational, diverse thinking and future focused, demonstrating scalability and benefits/broader impacts that can be sustained over time.

Of course, with that we want to see evidence of ability to deliver and the right mindset. That can be demonstrated in a clear, well thought out plan, sound success measures, capable people / teams, entrepreneurial spirit, growth mindset and willingness to learn and adapt

We’ll also looks favourably on applications where industry financially contributes (whether commercial companies or industry good organisations). This signals strong support for projects and is a good demonstration of collaboration and industry commitment.

Find out more about our grants and scholarships – and check out the FAQs – here.

BioLigna – Wood to Food

An AGMARDT Agribusiness Innovation Grant (AIG) has enabled BioLigna to achieve proof of concept for Wood to Food, a unique approach to producing a high-value food grade ingredient using wood residue converted to sugars as a feedstock.

“AGMARDT plays a wide-ranging role in the eco-system, but I particularly appreciate its early-stage funding in the ideation space,” says BioLigna project manager Amos Palfreyman.

“So many great opportunities never get underway because there is no-one willing to step up and provide grants for experimentation and incubation, but AGMARDT does that.”

The AIG grant kick-started testing of the Wood to Food concept. The project successfully identified strains of lactic acid bacteria with potential to be grown in this way. Options now being explored include using these in in production of specialist ingredients such as low-calorie sweeteners for use in plant-based food products.

Amos is passionate about food sustainability. He is the former business development manager, and now advisor for emerging proteins for FoodHQ. The world class food, science and innovation hub is a collaboration between internationally-recognised New Zealand companies, councils and research and educational institutions. He is also a co-founder and CEO of the Miruku foodtech company, which is developing alternative dairy proteins technology.

The BioLigna project had its origins in discussions at FoodHQ around ‘what does New Zealand’s role look like in the future of plant-based food’?

“When we look at ingredients of plant-based foods, beyond plant proteins they require ingredients not so well-known in the food industry,” says Amos. “For instance, sweeteners to address the bitter taste some plant foods have. Manufacturers don’t want to add sugar or sucrose because of the health aspect.

“A lot of the industry is importing many ingredients, such as sweeteners and plant-based proteins and these are being repackaged in ‘made in NZ’ products and sold here or exported. As more of these products are needed, more transparency in the supply chain will be required.

“We wanted to look at supporting plant-based food producers with natural ingredients from New Zealand – to look at what we have, including our unique botanicals, and what we can access and leverage. Then we could have a compelling story to tell about the most natural plant-based food, all produced here in New Zealand.”

Further inspiration came from a research document on bacteria being used to ferment wood-derived sugars into biofuel.

“The idea was sound but ultimately the economics had not stacked up for that,” says Amos. “But I thought, ‘could wood seconds be used to create high value feedstock for food-grade bacteria’? Especially as a lot of biomass is not being fully-utilised.”

The team worked with Crown Research Institute Scion, which had developed a proprietary technology to convert wood residues to fermentable sugars. Laboratory testing was provided through Massey University and AgResearch.

“We have been exploring a few different options and the best option is specialist health food ingredients such as low calorie sweeteners to use in formulas in the fast growing plant-based market,” says Amos. “There is also potential for probiotic fibre-based ingredients with these sweeteners, so you also get healthy gut microbiome.”

The AIG funding included covering travel costs for a post-graduate to undertake work on the project, Scion sample processing, lab hire and microbial materials costs.

“It helped enable testing of multiple strains of lactobacillus to find those that most enjoyed the ‘dinner’ we were providing,” says Amos.

BioLigna will now work with Scion and AgResearch to explore the techno-economic feasibility of specific ingredients and use non-GMO accelerated evolution platform to enhance bacterial strains to  improve growth and efficiency while creating a patentable microbial strain.

“Through the laboratory trial we have identified over a dozen strains that most efficiently used the wood sugar components to ferment single cell proteins and grew fastest,” says Amos.  “We now need to identify a number of targets in terms of high value low calorie sweeteners – xylitol, erythritol and mannitol for instance – to see which we can produce most efficiently.”

 

Common good action leaders

For dairy farmer Deborah Rhodes, the future of the industry depends not only on looking after the environment and animals, but the human beings the industry relies on.

“Humanity is the least economically valued factor in our dairy industry workplaces,” says Deborah, a 2021 AGMARDT Leadership Scholarship, undertaking a Master’s in Health – Workplace Health and Safety.

“What we need from future leaders is to bring this humanity, the duty of care and love of whanau, into our complex work relationships to create more equity and a balance of work and life outcomes in our industry.”

A registered nurse with a background in sales and marketing and project management in the international pharmaceuticals industry, Deborah owns a dairy farm in Collingwood with husband Tim and their three teenage children.

An active leader in the community and industry, Deborah sits on the Ministry for Primary Industry’s regenerative agriculture technical advisory group with past roles including school boards and Chair of the local Arts Council. She did stand unsuccessfully for the Fonterra Shareholders Council, Dairy NZ Board of Directors, and Golden Bay Community Board, to show commitment to the need for change.

Her driving passion is evolving leadership to support mental health, wellbeing, and workplace ethics for people in the dairy industry, looking to improve safety, wellbeing, and common good prosperity.

“Ultimately, common good action leadership is my take on the future for the industry and is driven by my experiences.”

Entering the booming dairy industry in 2010 as a second career, Deborah says she and husband Tim were surprised by the hierarchical nature of workplace relationships in the industry.

“We started out as farm assistants, right at the bottom of the ladder and it was there that the workplace injustices became evident. In an industry built on rapid growth with a lot of money at stake, employees were being squeezed to do jobs within tight timeframes, under huge pressure and with little opportunity for recourse.

“That motivated us to not only buy our own farm but do something for more equality.”

Deborah with husband Tim is pioneering healthier employment relationships in the dairy sector having developed the Responsible Work Relationships ™ framework with an accompanying app, that can be used to record, report, and trigger resolution, of relationship issues on farm.

“The framework has the potential to build regenerative workforces that are less hierarchical and exploitative, help retain staff and build skills for people to stay in communities, maintain performance, keep school rolls stable, and build more robust businesses in climate change.”

Supported by the AGMARDT Scholarship as part of her Master’s in Health, Deborah will be working to validate the framework and progress the app, also working alongside Māori to ensure the system is appropriate and accepted.

She sees the framework as being a useful tool to support the Employment Relations Act 2000, under which employers are responsible for the health and safety of their workers – including their wellbeing and psychosocial health.

She says farming contracts can be a far more significant driver of fatigue and harm to people than government regulations, but better measurables of production-based pay for share and contract milking arrangements, can then be a source of powerful metrics.

“Social and environmental metrics giving proof points of future food and fibre businesses will become imperatives for market approval of good, service and trade agreements.”

Deborah will also be using her Master’s in Health – Workplace Health and Safety study to better understand what type of leadership is needed to allow ‘common good action’ leaders to emerge and evolve in the dairy industry – and wider primary industry sector.

“Hierarchical structures can be an impediment to emerging leadership. When power is held, less leadership may be given, but common good action leaders achieve a lot because they understand the issues from the ground up.

“I have worked voluntarily for common good goals, and I know with responsible work relationships to restore our faith in humanity, means a long-term prosperous future for our primary industries.”

Using satellite science to measure river water quality

AGMARDT is funding laboratory testing for a new programme to develop ways to use satellite science to measure river water quality.

“Rivershot is an intelligent and innovative approach to water quality that is data-driven, highly directed, inquisitive and comprehensive in its commitment to learning and understanding,” says Paul Brown.

Former dairy farmer Paul, from Ashburton, is one of the core team of three driving development of the innovative programme which uses a combination of satellite-based spectral analysis and direct water sampling to monitor changes in river water quality and to identify nitrogen and e-coli levels.

AGMARDT provided funding to support regular testing of water samples during 2020 and 2021 to help Rivershot test and adapt its processes.

“As a dairy farmer, I was very aware that dairy farming is blamed for a lot of river pollution and I wanted to look at ways to help,” says Paul. “The other members of our team are a computer scientist and a space scientist .

“Rivershot portrays water quality by continuously tracking the extent of Nitrogen and E. coli content along the river. It works through a mixture of absorption, refraction and reflection of wavelengths. It is very complex but, by measuring wavelengths, you can detect what is in the water.”

While satellite-based programmes for analysis of lake water quality are already established, Paul  believes Rivershot technology is a world first for monitoring river water.

“Lakes are larger and more stable. Rivers are not as wide or deep and they move faster and weave through hills and urban and rural environments and various industry. There is the potential to monitor every river in New Zealand using this – and overseas too.

“Rather than taking river water samples in a handful of locations monthly, Rivershot looks across the whole river, taking up to 2000 test points per km, and averaging them over a length of river. Results will be presented within 48 hours of satellite imagery.”

Paul is funding technology development costs for the project and the AGMARDT funding enabled regular laboratory testing of river water samples to check against satellite analysis.

Initial pilot programmes were undertaken on the Avon, Cam, Kaiapoi and Rakaia rivers, with water samples taken on the same day as satellite imagery. The data set and analysis is being independently peer reviewed.

“We did a lot of testing with satellites and, at the same time, did traditional bucket testing,” says Paul. “We also used water testing data from LAWA (Land Air Water Aotearoa) to correlate our results.

“It’s been a constant process of developing our technology to overcome issues like flow and distinguishing stones from water. There have been many steps in the process but we have successfully demonstrated the process of using satellites to measure N and E. coli is possible on different types of rivers within NZ. We are now processing data from 60 rivers – mostly in the South Island but some in the North too.

“As an example, the Avon is one of the most tested rivers in the South Island – it is tested in seven places monthly by agencies like ECan and Christchurch City Council.. In one day, Rivershot can get 1,500 samples from the Avon. The Rakaia river is tested in two places monthly; we can get a shot every metre and over 50,000 samples in one day.”

The Rivershot team is now seeking partners to help take the programme to its next stage and ultimately to facilitate its uptake by agencies, government, independent groups and business groups, who can use it for their needs.

“We want to work with the right people for the right reasons,” says Paul.  Rivershot contributes to a sustainable river eco-system that benefits everyone.  Our system is a more holistic view of the whole river system and presents the results to clients very quickly. Therefore results can be acted upon  by those that monitor our rivers in real time to help prevent further pollution. Rivershot helps tell the whole story of the river , the good and the bad, as it passes through different localities that can effect water quality.

“Our aim is to become the trusted supplier of regular data from all possible fresh water rivers and waterways, and supply agencies, farmer groups, water care groups and individuals, that require this information to carry out their regulatory roles and maintain our fresh water standards for the benefit of all New Zealand.”

Turning NZ into the eco valley of the world

Alex Worker sees a future for New Zealand as the eco valley of the world, producing ethical, technology enabled food to help feed Asia Pacific more sustainably.

That may be a big ask, but this innovator and future-focused thinker is already well on track and as a 2022 AGMARDT Leadership Scholar will be furthering his goal.

The founding Chair of Future Food Aotearoa, a collective of food entrepreneurs committed to growing New Zealand’s foodtech industry, Alex has an extensive international career in food and agribusiness.

He has over a decade’s experience in sales, marketing and management for Fonterra in China and New Zealand, and wider experience in new ventures and business development across Australasia, the Americas, Greater China, and Asia Pacific – including co-founding and directing China’s first culinary incubator, Hatchery.

Aware of the changing dynamics of the global food industry, the challenges of climate change, population growth and changing customer needs and preferences, Alex sees significant opportunity for New Zealand to transform into a modern food system.

“Like any good garden, Aotearoa’s food system requires thought, care and attention. With the right knowledge, experience and leadership, New Zealand could become to food, what Silicon Valley is to software. We could become the Eco Valley of the world producing sustainable, technology-enabled and ethical foods.

“To do this we need to take a systems approach looking globally at what’s possible, where demand is heading, and where New Zealand fits in. Understanding our role in this value chain, investing in food technology and IP, and feeding both China and US with higher quality nutrition is our opportunity”.

Having lived in Asia for over 15 years, Alex is now based in Queenstown with his wife and young family and passionately pursuing his goal. He splits his time between several ventures, including leading the launch of Impossible Foods’ meats from plants into New Zealand.

“Once New Zealanders and farmers start to experience the delicious meat taste of Impossible that’s made from plants, they’ll open to a new world of possibilities.”

Alex is also a partner in two New Zealand foodtech ventures LILO Desserts and NewFish. LILO is focused on harnessing fruit waste, the 10% that never makes it out of the orchard and turning it into novel plant-based desserts. NewFish is scaling up use of micro-algae as a powerful, protein rich future food from New Zealand.

And he sits on the steering committee of Te Hono, a partnership between food and fibre sector industry leaders, iwi, and government agencies with a vision to turn New Zealand into a global food and fibre exemplar economically, environmentally and socially. He also sits on MPI’s food and beverage industry transformation plan advisory board.

Focused on further honing his governance skills to better represent New Zealand’s growing pipeline of food entrepreneurs, Alex will be using the AGMARDT Leadership Scholarship to complete Harvard Kennedy School’s Public Leadership Credential programme.

“With the Harvard programme, my aim is to significantly upgrade my governance, public good thinking and leadership skills to have a greater impact on the betterment of Aotearoa New Zealand.

“I’m really grateful for AGMARDT’s support. It’s a progressive signal to take a risk on my type of profile. In turn I hope to de-risk their investment and use the opportunity to drive real, collective impact across New Zealand’s food and fibre sector.”